Category Archives: Ethical Issues

Content concerning ethical issues.

Defining Abortion as the Intentional Killing of an Unborn Child

Abortion is commonly defined as the “termination of a pregnancy” (or a “termination of a pregnancy prior to viability”).  This may suffice in certain limited contexts in which only the medical aspects of pregnancy are under discussion.  However, in the normal usage of the term, when the moral aspect of abortion is under discussion, this definition is inadequate.  The simple reason is that the moral aspect of abortion is not whether or not the pregnancy is terminated prematurely.  Rather, the question is whether or not the life of the unborn child was intentionally taken by the pregnancy-terminating procedure in question. Continue reading

Why Abolition Must Be Non-Violent

Being involved in the promulgation and defense of abolitionist ideology, there are occasions in which scoffers attempt to ridicule abolitionists for not using physical force and violence to stop abortions from occurring.  In addition, there are times when those interested in having an honest and substantive dialogue ask why we do not condone using force and violence to stop abortions, given the human lives are being extinguished daily.  In this post, in order to answer these questions and objections, I present seven principles, following from and consistent with a Scriptural worldview, that mandate a non-violent approach to the abolition of human abortion.

Continue reading

Abortion and the Life of the Mother

An objection commonly launched against those who oppose the practice of human abortion is “what about the life of the mother?” In this post, I examine this objection and provide a consistent response from within the abolitionist framework. Continue reading

Roe on Roe v. Wade

Today is the 39th anniversary of Roe v. Wade.  It is a great irony (and a work of God’s grace) that “Jane Roe” is now a pro-life advocate who is working to overturn the Supreme court decision that bears her name.  Please take a few moments to read her views on the matter, expressed in her 2005 Senate testimony.  More information on her pro-life activism  can be found at her website:  www.roenomore.org.

More information on the abolition of the practice of human abortion can be found here:

Abort73.com

AbolishHumanAbortion.com

The Incoherence of “Consenting to Pregnancy”

It is not uncommon for pro-choice advocates to make the claim that “consenting to sex does not entail consenting to pregnancy.”  The idea is that even though the woman takes responsibility for engaging in an act of procreation, she bears no moral obligation to take responsibility for the pregnancy that results.  In this post, I argue that the idea of “consenting to pregnancy,” per se, is logically incoherent, and that such claims, understood in a logically coherent way, ultimately do nothing to advance the pro-choice position. Continue reading

The Consistent Abolitionist: The Extreme Case of Dr. Gisella Perl

In a collaborative effort between Ian John Philoponus, Rhology, and myself, we recently analyzed the case of Dr. Gisella Perl, and provided a response from the abolitionist perspective.  Dr. Perl was an inmate at Auschwitz who performed abortions on Jewish women to prevent them from being vivisected at the hands of Josef Mengele.  Such an extreme case in such horrific circumstances seems to provide a counterexample to the idea that human abortion is always morally unjustified.  In this two-part series, we analyze the scenario, and provide an ethical analysis that demonstrates the consistency of the abolitionist position.

The Consistent Abolitionist: The Extreme Case of Dr. Gisella Perl (Part 1)

The Consistent Abolitionist: The Extreme Case of Dr. Gisella Perl (Part 2)

Killing Babies On Account of Future Suffering

Someone recently wrote the following over at the Abolitionist Society of Oklahoma blog:

Question- what is exactly wrong with eugenics?

I understand that it’s wrong in the sense of basing it off of culture and race; but when it comes to diseases, it might be better to end their lives, so they won’t be subjected to a life of pain and confusion.

This type of sentiment may sound reasonable in today’s post-Christian milieu, but under further examination, it is found to be fraught with difficulties. Continue reading